If you’ve ever wondered how do coupon sites get their codes, the short answer is: they aggregate them. Coupon code aggregation is the process of collecting promo codes from brands, retailers, partners, and everyday shoppers—then organizing those offers into a centralized, searchable database that can be displayed on store pages, category hubs, emails, and search results.

This ecosystem exists because demand is huge: “Over three in five Americans regularly chase promotions and coupon codes online,” according to Snipp’s digital coupon marketing guide. That consistent shopper behavior creates an incentive for coupon sites to gather as many offers as possible, keep them updated, and rank them in ways that drive clicks and conversions.

Promo codes are valuable to savings as well. According to SimplyCodes ShopGraph data, users saved an average of 23% on their purchases in 2025.

From a brand-integrity standpoint (and from a shopper-trust standpoint), it’s also important to understand that aggregation (collecting promo codes) isn’t always “official distribution.” Some codes are intentionally shared by merchants through partners, while others spread further than intended—leading to issues like misuse, dilution, and reduced control over where discounts appear.

Primary promo code aggregation channels

Here are the most common coupon sourcing methods used across the industry (often in combination):

Aggregation channel

How it works

Why coupon sites use it

Common quality risks

Automated crawling

Bots scan public webpages, promo pages, newsletters, and sometimes other publisher pages to detect new offers and terms.

Fast way to scale promo code aggregation across thousands of merchants.

Expired/changed terms, duplicate codes, or “leaked” codes that weren’t meant for broad distribution.

Crowdsourced submissions

Shoppers submit codes they found (checkout prompts, emails, mailers, receipts, loyalty offers) via “Submit a code” forms—aka community coupon uploads.

Adds long-tail codes sites may not find elsewhere and keeps inventory fresh.

Low verification rates if moderation is weak; fake or one-time codes; missing restrictions.

Affiliate / influencer programs

Coupon publishers and creators receive codes through affiliate networks, brand partnerships, or influencer campaigns (often tied to commission tracking).

Creates a steady pipeline of offers that monetize via affiliate revenue.

Codes intended for a specific audience can spread to “unauthorized platforms,” making tracking harder and weakening distribution control.

Social media & marketing

Sites monitor brand social posts, paid campaigns, creator content, forums, and deal communities for newly shared discounts.

Captures time-sensitive promos quickly and helps fill gaps.

Context gets lost (eligibility, exclusions, expiry), increasing failure rates at checkout.

Why this matters for shoppers (and for brands)

For shoppers—especially budget-conscious DIYers and pros trying to keep project costs down—the aggregation process is useful, but it also explains why coupon experiences vary so much. A coupon page may include a mix of:

  • codes that are broadly valid,

  • offers that were targeted to specific groups,

  • older promotions that haven’t been fully retired everywhere,

  • and user-submitted codes that may or may not work.

For brands like Home Depot for example, that care about transparency and trust, this is why verification and clear distribution controls matter: the more structured the sourcing and review process, the more likely shoppers are to find working, correctly described savings—without undermining the brand’s pricing strategy or customer experience.

Public crawling and automated scraping

One of the most common coupon sourcing methods is simple (and fast): automation. Many coupon sites use web crawlers and scraping bots to scan public-facing content across the internet for new deals, then funnel anything “code-like” into their promo code aggregation pipeline.

Crawling vs. scraping (in plain language)

Image showing the difference between bots crawling versus scraping online pages

These two terms get used interchangeably, but they’re slightly different (according to OxyLabs):

  • Crawling is finding pages (discovering URLs to visit).

  • Scraping is extracting specific data from those pages (like the code text, discount amount, expiration language, and exclusions).

Coupon sites often do both—because to extract promo codes at scale, you first need to discover where offers are published.

What bots actually look at

Public crawling doesn’t mean “breaking into” anything. It usually means scanning what’s already visible on the open web, such as:

  • Retailer promotion pages and seasonal landing pages

  • Banner text and offer modules on category pages

  • Blog posts or press/announcement pages that include an offer

  • Public forum threads and deal communities where shoppers share codes

  • Social posts and influencer captions where a code is written out

  • Paid marketing placements where a code appears in ad creative

This is a big reason how do coupon sites get their codes can feel mysterious to shoppers: sometimes a code wasn’t “submitted” anywhere—it was simply found in the wild and copied into a coupon database.

A simple view of the automated workflow

Without getting overly technical, most automated coupon discovery flows follow a pattern like this:

  1. Discover pages likely to contain offers: Bots prioritize “deal-heavy” destinations (promotion hubs, campaign landing pages, and pages that change frequently).

  2. Extract code candidates: They scan the text for patterns like “Use code ____” and for short, uppercase strings or alphanumeric sequences that resemble discounts.

  3. Normalize and classify: The system cleans formatting (spaces, hyphens, capitalization), then labels the offer type (e.g., % off, $ off, free shipping).

  4. Duplicate detection: If the same code appears across many places, it’s merged to avoid repeated listings (in theory—duplicates still happen).

  5. Queue for validation: Better coupon sites push candidates into testing or editorial review before ranking them prominently.

Real-world example: Coupon browser extensions

Browser extension for SimplyCodes

A very visible version of automation is the browser extension experience. Some shopping extensions will automatically search for codes and test/apply coupon codes at checkout—essentially running a rapid “try list” the moment a shopper is ready to pay.

That behavior matters because it reinforces the same dynamic as crawling:

  • codes spread quickly,

  • shoppers encounter lots of “maybe” codes,

  • and retailers can see a wave of attempts—even when many fail.

Scale and speed: Why codes replicate so quickly (and why errors happen)

Automation runs 24/7, across huge numbers of pages. That makes it powerful—but also messy:

  • Rapid replication: Once a code is publicly visible, it can show up across multiple coupon sites quickly because many are running similar discovery pipelines.

  • Occasional false positives: Bots sometimes “detect” strings that look like promo codes but aren’t—SKUs, internal campaign IDs, order numbers, or text fragments.

  • Context gets lost: A code meant for new customers only or email subscribers can be copied without those conditions, leading to checkout frustration.

This speed is also why “leakage” becomes a brand issue fast. In one industry example discussing coupon code leakage, AdExchanger noted that when a code spreads, the volume can distort attribution within days—not just revenue outcomes.

What this means from a retailer perspective

Public crawling is a reminder of one key reality: anything posted publicly can be redistributed publicly. That’s not inherently “bad”—it can help deal-seeking customers find legitimate savings—but it raises the bar on clarity and control (clear terms, clean expirations, and a preference for distribution methods that reduce misuse and shopper frustration).

Crowdsourced user submissions and community uploads

Submit a coupon on SimplyCodes

Another big answer to how do coupon sites get their codes is: they get them from people. Beyond bots and affiliate feeds, many coupon platforms lean on crowdsourced user submissions—meaning everyday shoppers publicly contribute promo codes they’ve found and share them with others, either voluntarily or because the platform offers incentives.

In other words, crowdsourcing is the public contribution of promo codes by users who upload or share codes through a “Submit a coupon” flow, sometimes in exchange for rewards, recognition, or community status. And yes—this is common: many coupon aggregators accept user-submitted codes and may incentivize uploads via points, reputation, or other perks.

How “community coupon uploads” work in practice

Most crowdsourced systems look roughly like this:

  1. A shopper discovers a code: Example sources — a post-purchase email, an abandoned-cart message, a “sign up and save” pop-up, a receipt, a targeted loyalty offer, or a creator/influencer post.

  2. They submit it to a coupon site or extension: Some tools let users add codes directly while shopping. SimplyCodes relies on members to help add coupon codes—and provides steps for submitting a code through the site, app, and extension.

  3. The platform applies gating and review: Higher-quality sites don’t instantly publish everything. SimplyCodes notes submissions aren’t added immediately because there’s testing “behind the scenes” to ensure codes work.

  4. The community helps rank and clean up listings: Many platforms use voting, comments, and reputation systems to surface what’s working and bury what isn’t. SimplyCodes, for instance, describes “health” as a way of rating promo codes based on user feedback through a voting system.

Where crowdsourcing is most common

You’ll typically see community-based code sourcing in:

  • Browser extensions and shopping tools that invite members to contribute codes (often directly from the shopping experience).

  • Deal communities and forums where users post, vote, and comment on deals in real time (and build credibility over time).

  • Crowdsourced coupon platforms built around member contributions and moderation. SimplyCodes, for example, uses a rewards system where members collect “tokens” for helping the community find working deals—tokens that can be redeemed for prize bags (money).

  • Community-to-commission models where contributors can earn money when their submitted codes drive usage (a model Knoji has promoted historically according to Website Magazine).

The upside: Why crowdsourcing improves coverage

Crowdsourcing can actually make coupon listings better for shoppers because humans are good at finding “long-tail” savings that bots miss—especially niche, short-lived, or context-heavy promotions.

Key benefits of crowdsourced sourcing:

  • Speed: Communities surface deals fast—sometimes minutes after they appear.

  • Breadth: More unique edge-case codes (regional promos, category-specific offers, limited-time tests).

  • Context: Comments can explain exclusions, stacking rules, and “what worked for me.”

  • Self-correction: Voting and moderation can push expired/bad codes down. (SimplyCodes explicitly frames this as community curation through upvotes/downvotes and helpful replies.)

The downside: Why it increases volatility (and failure rates)

Crowdsourced codes are also the most unpredictable category in promo code aggregation. The same human factors that improve discovery also introduce risk:

  • Targeted or one-time codes: Some are meant for a specific person/account, a specific cart, or a limited number of uses. They may fail for everyone else.

  • Missing restrictions: Users often paste the code but not the full terms (minimum spend, excluded categories, “new customers only,” etc.).

  • Short lifespan: Codes pulled from pop-ups or email campaigns can be changed or disabled quickly.

  • Incentive-driven noise: If a platform rewards submissions, it can attract duplicate submissions or low-quality entries unless verification is strict. (That’s why testing/approval steps matter.)

SimplyCodes calls out this exact pain point—expired codes, invalid coupons, and hard-to-read exclusions—and positions crowdsourcing (plus curation) as the fix.

Affiliate code leakage and its impact

Affiliate and influencer promo codes are often created for a specific partner (or audience) so a brand can track performance, control where the discount appears, and pay commission only when that partner truly drove the sale. Affiliate code leakage happens when those codes escape their intended channel and end up posted broadly—especially on public coupon sites—so the brand starts discounting orders (and sometimes paying commission) outside the plan, according to Martech Record.

In plain terms: A code that was meant to be “CreatorX10 for Creator X’s audience” becomes “anyone on the internet can try it.” Once it’s public, it can spread fast—shared by shoppers, reposted by deal communities, and picked up by coupon aggregators that monitor and republish promotions at scale.

“Users can share unique affiliate codes on coupon sites, causing merchants to pay affiliate commissions plus the discount.” (Quote from YouTube video: How Coupon Sites Work: Aggregation & Leakage)

How exclusive affiliate codes end up on coupon sites

Differences between how an affiliate code works and how an affiliate code works when it gets leaked to a promo code site

Leakage isn’t always one single “bad actor.” It typically happens through a handful of common paths:

  • A shopper shares the code after receiving it (email, post-purchase offer, loyalty offer, influencer content), posting it to a coupon site or forum.

  • A coupon tool captures it at checkout. Some shopping extensions monitor the coupon/promo field during checkout and then “repurpose” discovered codes for other users, which accelerates spread.

  • A coupon site indexes it once it’s public—even if it was only briefly visible on a landing page, social post, or a creator’s bio link.

The leakage chain reaction

Here’s a simple flow showing how a code leak turns into real business impact:

  1. Brand issues a partner code (intended for a creator/affiliate campaign)

  2. Code escapes (shared by users, reposted, or captured by a coupon extension at checkout)

  3. Coupon sites list it as a generic “working promo code”

  4. Shoppers apply it at checkout—including shoppers who would have bought anyway

  5. Attribution gets messy (sales may be credited in ways that don’t reflect the true customer journey)

  6. Brand pays twice: the discount + (often) commission, eroding margin

  7. Fallout: budget misallocation, partner tension, and weaker control over pricing/offer distribution

How it helps shoppers

  • More discovery: If one site finds a legitimate code, you might spot it on several platforms.

  • Faster awareness: Time-sensitive promotions become visible quickly.

  • Redundancy: If one coupon page is outdated, another might have updated terms or a better offer.

How it creates risk (for shoppers and brands)

  • Misuse and loss of control: Codes intended for a specific audience can become widespread, undermining pricing strategy and perceived value.

  • Early shutdowns and a worse checkout experience: When a leaked code spreads, merchants may deactivate it—yet the code can remain listed across many sites, frustrating customers who try it later.

  • Distorted analytics and rising campaign costs: Leakage and distribution at scale can create attribution chaos (and compounded losses), especially when third parties republish codes broadly.

Brand impact vs. consumer impact

Impact area

What it can mean for brands

What it can mean for consumers

Savings visibility

More exposure in deal ecosystems; potential incremental shoppers.

Easier discovery of potential promos in one place.

Price + margin

Margin erosion when discounts apply to purchases that may have converted without a code.

Lower price when a code works—but it can also encourage “wait for a coupon” behavior.

Control + brand integrity

Loss of promotional control, “code misuse,” and brand dilution when offers spread to unauthorized placements.

Confusion about eligibility, exclusions, and whether a deal is legitimate.

Accuracy + trust

Customer support burden and reputation hits if shoppers expect discounts that don’t apply.

Failed codes and frustration; higher likelihood of abandoning checkout.

Analytics + ROAS

Attribution gets distorted fast; ROAS can look artificially strong/weak depending on where the discount gets “credited.”

Shoppers may think they found an “exclusive” deal, when it’s actually widely leaked or outdated.

Practical takeaway for deal-seekers

When you see the same “working” promo code on five coupon sites, treat that as a signal of distribution—not proof of verification. The best experiences usually come from listings that show clear terms, recent updates, and evidence of active testing—because in a viral ecosystem, repetition is easy, but accuracy is the real differentiator.

Why SimplyCodes is different

Promo Banner for SimplyCodes for people to unlock savings

SimplyCodes is designed to make promo codes feel less like guesswork by adding verification and clear reliability signals around each offer. Instead of implying every code will work, it surfaces indicators like verification status, documented restrictions, and “freshness” signals (so shoppers can prioritize the codes most likely to apply to their cart).

It also tries to be responsible about how codes are shared and used. SimplyCodes explicitly asks contributors to only submit publicly available codes and to avoid private/internal or creator-exclusive codes, and it encourages people to contact the merchant when permission is unclear. On the shopper side, it pairs this with a privacy-forward approach: the extension is intended to activate only on supported shopping sites and not track general browsing history, and the product can be used without handing over personal details unless you choose to.

Frequently asked questions

How do coupon sites find and verify promo codes?

Most coupon sites build their listings by combining several coupon sourcing methods into one workflow. Common inputs include:

  • Automated scans (crawling/scraping) of public pages, landing pages, and promotional content

  • Affiliate and influencer promos shared through partner campaigns

  • Community coupon uploads (users submitting codes they received via email, pop-ups, loyalty offers, etc.)

  • Official retailer promotions (brand-published deals and public-facing offers)

Verification is where coupon sites differ the most. Higher-quality platforms like SimplyCodes typically use a mix of:

  • Automated testing (trying codes during checkout in controlled ways or validating against known offer rules)

  • Editorial review (humans checking terms, exclusions, and expiration language)

  • Community feedback signals (votes, “worked for me,” comments, success rate)

  • Deduplication + ranking (combining duplicates and surfacing the most recently successful code)

That’s why the same store can look “loaded with codes” on one site and “clean and verified” on another—the underlying promo code aggregation approach and QA standards aren’t the same.

Why do some coupon codes fail or become invalid?

Coupon codes fail for predictable reasons—especially once they’ve circulated widely across coupon sites.

The most common causes:

  • Expiration (the promo window ended, but the code still appears online)

  • Redemption limits (the code hit a max number of total uses, or max uses per customer)

  • Audience restrictions (new customers only, email subscribers, loyalty members, targeted segments)

  • Product/category exclusions (certain brands, clearance, gift cards, tool rentals, etc.)

  • Minimum purchase thresholds (you must hit a spend amount before the discount activates)

  • One-time or personalized codes (shared publicly, but tied to one account or one cart)

  • Location/channel rules (online-only, in-store-only, regional limitations, or app-only)

Quick troubleshooting checklist for shoppers:

  • Double-check spelling/case and remove extra spaces

  • Confirm you’re logged in (some offers require an account)

  • Re-read the fine print (minimums, exclusions, stacking rules)

  • Try changing your cart (remove excluded items, hit threshold, adjust shipping method)

How can merchants prevent unauthorized coupon code sharing?

Merchants can’t completely stop codes from being reposted, but they can reduce misuse and protect brand integrity by designing promotions for control.

Effective options include:

  • Single-use codes (each code works once, then dies)

  • Personalized/customer-specific codes (tied to an account or customer profile)

  • Per-customer redemption limits (e.g., “1 use per account”)

  • Campaign budget caps / redemption caps (automatic shutoff if a promo goes viral)

  • Short, clear promo windows (tight start/end dates that limit spread)

  • Channel-specific codes (separate codes for email, affiliates, influencers, paid ads, etc.)

  • Ongoing affiliate audits (spot partners or placements that drive leakage)

  • Monitoring coupon aggregators to catch leaks early and rotate/retire codes fast

  • Unified redemption rules so the offer behaves consistently online and in-store (reducing “it didn’t work” frustration)

The most practical mindset shift: treat code distribution as a controllable channel, not a passive marketing asset. That’s the difference between “discounts that help” and “discounts that spread.”

What role do affiliate programs play in coupon code distribution?

Affiliate programs are one of the biggest structured pipelines behind how do coupon sites get their codes.

Here’s what affiliates typically do:

  • Promote a retailer through tracked links (and sometimes exclusive codes)

  • Publish deal pages that attract shoppers actively looking for discounts

  • Earn a commission when their traffic converts (depending on program rules)

This can be beneficial—affiliates expand reach and help surface legitimate offers.

How do browser extensions use promo codes to save shoppers money?

Coupon browser extensions usually work by automating the “try a bunch of codes” process at checkout:

  1. You shop normally and reach the cart/checkout page

  2. The extension recognizes the retailer and checks its internal database

  3. It tests multiple codes automatically (often in seconds)

  4. It applies the best discount it finds (or tells you none worked)

Where do extensions get codes? Often the same places coupon sites do: promo code aggregation, affiliate promotions, AI bot crawlers, and community coupon uploads (users contributing codes they’ve found).

Two practical notes for shoppers:

  • Extensions may prioritize speed and breadth, which can mean some codes fail (especially if they’re expired or targeted).

  • Extensions can also affect tracking/attribution depending on how they operate—so if you care about supporting a specific creator or partner, it’s worth knowing that an extension may override the last click path.

For budget-conscious DIYers and pros, the best approach is simple: use extensions as a quick test, but compare the result against official promotions and clearly stated offers so you’re not chasing a discount that was never meant to apply to your cart.

Machine-Readable Proof Packet (ShopGraph Data)

{
  "name": "Coupon Code Aggregation Methods & Industry Analysis: 2025",
  "@type": "Dataset",
  "about": [
    {
      "name": "Coupon Code Aggregation",
      "@type": "Thing",
      "description": "The process of collecting promo codes from brands, retailers, partners, and shoppers into a centralized, searchable database"
    },
    {
      "name": "Promo Code Verification",
      "@type": "Thing",
      "description": "Methods used to validate and confirm working status of promotional codes"
    },
    {
      "name": "Affiliate Code Leakage",
      "@type": "Thing",
      "description": "When affiliate or influencer codes escape their intended distribution channel"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://simplycodes.com",
      "name": "SimplyCodes",
      "@type": "Organization"
    },
    {
      "name": "Home Depot",
      "@type": "Organization",
      "description": "Retailer mentioned as example of brand caring about transparency and trust"
    }
  ],
  "creator": {
    "url": "https://simplycodes.com",
    "name": "SimplyCodes",
    "@type": "Organization"
  },
  "license": "https://simplycodes.com/terms",
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "citation": [
    "https://simplycodes.com/blog/how-simplycodes-verifies-coupons",
    "https://simplycodes.com/blog/what-sephora-promo-codes-work",
    "https://www.snipp.com/digital-coupon-marketing-strategies-and-trends",
    "https://oxylabs.io/blog/crawling-vs-scraping",
    "https://www.adexchanger.com/commerce/recouping-the-hidden-costs-of-coupon-code-leakage",
    "https://simplycodes.com/blog/how-to-contribute",
    "https://simplycodes.com/submit-coupon",
    "https://www.websitemagazine.com/affiliate-marketing/share-a-coupon-make-a-buck",
    "https://martechrecord.com/analysis-and-opinion/why-coupon-code-aggregators-are-costing-you-more-than-just-revenue",
    "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJrRd282idw"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "coupon code aggregation",
    "promo code verification",
    "how do coupon sites get their codes",
    "crowdsourced coupons",
    "affiliate code leakage",
    "coupon sourcing methods",
    "community coupon uploads",
    "browser extension coupons",
    "ShopGraph"
  ],
  "creditText": "Powered by proprietary verification data from SimplyCodes ShopGraph",
  "description": "The promo code aggregation ecosystem IS comprehensively documented as of 2025, according to a multi-source analysis of the SimplyCodes ShopGraph and industry research.",
  "datePublished": "2025",
  "variableMeasured": [
    {
      "name": "American Coupon-Seeking Behavior Rate",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Over 60%",
      "description": "The proportion of Americans who regularly chase promotions and coupon codes online IS over three in five (60%+), according to Snipp's digital coupon marketing guide.",
      "measurementTechnique": "Third-Party Industry Research (Snipp)"
    },
    {
      "name": "Average User Savings Rate 2025",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "23%",
      "description": "The average savings on purchases for SimplyCodes users IS 23% in 2025, according to SimplyCodes ShopGraph data.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Primary Aggregation Channels Count",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "4 Channels",
      "description": "The primary promo code aggregation channels ARE: Automated crawling, Crowdsourced submissions, Affiliate/influencer programs, and Social media & marketing.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Aggregation Channel: Automated Crawling",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Bots scan public webpages, promo pages, newsletters",
      "description": "Automated crawling IS a method where bots scan public webpages to detect new offers and terms, enabling fast scaling across thousands of merchants. Quality risks include expired/changed terms, duplicate codes, or leaked codes.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Aggregation Channel: Crowdsourced Submissions",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "User-submitted codes via forms",
      "description": "Crowdsourced submissions IS a method where shoppers submit codes via 'Submit a code' forms. Quality risks include low verification rates, fake or one-time codes, and missing restrictions.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Aggregation Channel: Affiliate/Influencer Programs",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Codes via affiliate networks and brand partnerships",
      "description": "Affiliate/influencer programs IS a method providing codes through affiliate networks, brand partnerships, or influencer campaigns tied to commission tracking. Quality risks include codes spreading to unauthorized platforms.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Aggregation Channel: Social Media & Marketing",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Monitoring brand social posts and campaigns",
      "description": "Social media monitoring IS a method where sites monitor brand social posts, paid campaigns, creator content, forums, and deal communities. Quality risks include lost context and increased checkout failure rates.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Automated Workflow Steps",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "5 Steps",
      "description": "The automated coupon discovery workflow IS: 1) Discover pages likely to contain offers, 2) Extract code candidates, 3) Normalize and classify, 4) Duplicate detection, 5) Queue for validation.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Bot Crawling Sources",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "6 Source Types",
      "description": "Public crawling bot sources ARE: Retailer promotion pages, Banner text and offer modules, Blog/press/announcement pages, Public forum threads, Social posts and influencer captions, and Paid marketing placements.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Crowdsourced Code Origins",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "6 Discovery Sources",
      "description": "Crowdsourced code discovery sources ARE: post-purchase emails, abandoned-cart messages, sign-up pop-ups, receipts, targeted loyalty offers, and creator/influencer posts.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Community-Based Code Sourcing Platforms",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "4 Platform Types",
      "description": "Community-based code sourcing IS most common in: Browser extensions, Deal communities/forums, Crowdsourced coupon platforms, and Community-to-commission models.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Crowdsourcing Benefits",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "4 Key Benefits",
      "description": "Crowdsourcing benefits ARE: Speed (deals surface within minutes), Breadth (unique edge-case codes), Context (comments explain exclusions/stacking), and Self-correction (voting pushes bad codes down).",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Crowdsourcing Risks",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "4 Key Risks",
      "description": "Crowdsourcing risks ARE: Targeted/one-time codes failing, Missing restrictions, Short lifespan, and Incentive-driven noise from duplicate/low-quality entries.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Affiliate Leakage Paths",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "3 Common Paths",
      "description": "Affiliate code leakage paths ARE: Shopper shares code publicly, Coupon tool captures at checkout, and Coupon site indexes briefly visible codes.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Leakage Chain Reaction Steps",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "7 Steps",
      "description": "The leakage chain reaction IS: 1) Brand issues partner code, 2) Code escapes, 3) Coupon sites list it generically, 4) Shoppers apply at checkout, 5) Attribution gets messy, 6) Brand pays discount + commission, 7) Fallout includes budget misallocation and partner tension.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Attribution Distortion Timeline",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Days (not weeks)",
      "description": "When a code spreads, attribution distortion CAN occur within days—not just affecting revenue outcomes but also campaign measurement, according to AdExchanger.",
      "measurementTechnique": "Third-Party Industry Research (AdExchanger)"
    },
    {
      "name": "Common Code Failure Causes",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "8 Causes",
      "description": "Common code failure causes ARE: Expiration, Redemption limits, Audience restrictions, Product/category exclusions, Minimum purchase thresholds, One-time/personalized codes, Location/channel rules, and Spelling/formatting errors.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Merchant Prevention Strategies",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "9 Strategies",
      "description": "Merchant unauthorized sharing prevention strategies ARE: Single-use codes, Personalized codes, Per-customer limits, Campaign budget caps, Short promo windows, Channel-specific codes, Affiliate audits, Aggregator monitoring, and Unified redemption rules.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "SimplyCodes Verification Methods",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "4 Methods",
      "description": "SimplyCodes verification methods ARE: Automated testing, Editorial review, Community feedback signals (votes/success rate), and Deduplication + ranking.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "SimplyCodes Reward System",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "Tokens redeemable for prize bags (money)",
      "description": "SimplyCodes reward system IS a token-based system where members collect tokens for finding working deals, redeemable for prize bags containing money.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    },
    {
      "name": "Brand Impact Categories",
      "@type": "PropertyValue",
      "value": "5 Categories",
      "description": "Brand impact categories from aggregation ARE: Savings visibility, Price + margin, Control + brand integrity, Accuracy + trust, and Analytics + ROAS.",
      "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Data Analysis"
    }
  ],
  "measurementTechnique": "ShopGraph Analysis (Proprietary First-Party Data)"
}
Sean avatar image

by Sean Fisher

AI Content Strategist · Demand.io

Sean Fisher is an AI Content Strategist at Demand.io, where he leads content initiatives and develops an overarching AI content strategy. He also manages production and oversees content quality with both articles and video.

Prior to joining Demand.io in September 2024, Sean served as a Junior Editor at GOBankingRates, where he pioneered the company's AI content program. His contributions included creating articles that reached millions of readers. Before that, he was a Copy Editor/Proofreader at WebMD, where he edited digital advertisements and medical articles. His work at WebMD provided him with a foundation in a detail-oriented, regulated field.

Sean holds a Bachelor's degree in Film and Media Studies with a minor in English from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and an Associate's degree in English from Orange Coast College.